Gadgets & Tech

Money troubles stall green town project
This story has mostly positive ratings. 90 votes / 1 sink

Money troubles stall green town project

Gadgets & Tech – This one-stoplight farming hamlet had big dreams in 2005 when it was christened BioTown USA.

Tags: Indiana, BioTown USA, BioTown, ethanol, energy, green

Report

Filter Comments ›
1 - 12 of 12 Comments by 7 members  RSS Feed for comments

1

Add Comment
avatar
Reply

Nice try, but "green" is more expensive and the economic benefits don't exist yet.

avatar
Reply

Going green means going broke. It's why nobody REALLY cares about Al Gore's "Inconvenient" hooey.

Well, nobody that is, except psychopathic, irrational liberals.

avatar
Reply

A while back the 'Gore Defenders' were talking about buying and selling 'Carbon Credits' and that the money was supposed to be used for things like this in the bill of goods they sold to people. Well, where is the money? Why isn't it being put up to help this town go green? Is the 'Carbon Credit' nothing more than a scam?

avatar
Reply

Yes, it is a scam ... It's about the money, not the greenery.

avatar
Reply

I forgot ... money is green. That makes it OK.

avatar
Reply

Carbon Credits is a scam and are useless. But the problem is not that there is no technology, it's that big business wants a fortune for it in the US. If you travel the world you will find places where it's already working but when they try to do it in the US it fails, why?

avatar
Reply

living green can work but the idea of an entire town is too much!

avatar
Reply

Not really, what you need to wonder is are they trying to fail in the first place? They mention the cost of creating there own power grid, why do that at all, it's a wast of money and not needed. All power flow can be measured and directed with some simple modification. If it's being done elsewhere why must it be harder to do in the US? Could it be because big business wants it to fail?

avatar
Reply

LOL

France has gone nuclear with their power plants and that is a green technology. Waste from a nuclear plant for a year is the size that fits in a pickup truck. Coal plants will fill a football field. This town ignores that most power in this country comes from fossil fuels. The rest of the things are cost prohibitive. Also ignored is the fact that the program started in the 60's to clean up the air, water, and ground has been very successful.

avatar
Reply

Your right about the amount of power from fossil fuels, as of 2006 seventy percent is derived from coal (50%) and oil and natural gas (20%). I don't think nuclear qualifies as green simply on the toxicity and length of toxicity of the waste left. While some clean up has worked by and large it is still getting worse and not better out there. If I lived in almost any major city in north America there would be so many days a year I couldn't go outside because of poor air quality, most of that is directly related to motor vehicle emissions, coal use, and manufacturing using chemicals. Thats why I would like to see major changes in fuel consumption standards for cars and trucks and more power generated from natural resources.

avatar
Reply

Oh no! What good is it if we save the planet and we are all broke?!?!

As long as we are all rich, who care what happens to this planet, we can just buy another one, right?

How many hundreds of light years could the next possible inhabitable planet be anyways.

Im sure we will have enough crude oil left over to get us there.

avatar
Reply

If greedy hands can be kept out of it going green can be cost effective.

1

Add Comment

You must log in first to post a comment. Secure Signin

Not a member? Sign-up today!


Who voted on this story?

View all (74) »

Who sunk this story?

Channels
AnchorsArt & DesignAutos
BooksCareers & JobsCelebrities
Do No EvilDo-It-YourselfFamily
FoodGadgets & TechGay & Lesbian
Health & FitnessHumorLove & Personals
MenMoneyMovies
MusicNewsPets
PoliticsPopular VideosReal Estate
ReligionScienceShopping
SportsTelevisionTravel
VideoVideo GamesWomen